Yes (though not the direct purpose) Yes for Seed (faster to raise $1M when a $500k check is written by a sidecar fund manager)
More small rounds
No
Faster rounds (esp. AI)
No
Additionally, angel group side car funds can help to derisk early stage investments, especially if there is a capped return on public money, preferential buy-back provisions, or if some of the public funds are given as grants. Alternatively, angels and other early-stage investors can be encouraged through the use of incentives such as investor tax credits. These are not always popular with policymakers, since they may be difficult to budget and do not (directly) bring any of the benefits of angel groups. However, evidence from elsewhere (e.g. the UK’s SEIS scheme 2 ) suggests that they can increase the total amount of angel investment, and may also increase the proportion of seed investments allocated by Canadian investors to Canadian startups compared with foreign ones. The set of policies and initiatives that Startup Genome co-designed with Josh Lerner, Head of Entrepreneurship Faculty at Harvard Business School, and Kate Cornick, CEO of LaunchVic, Have had a measurable impact. In the last three years, the Seed-Funding gap of Melbourne has measurably decreased compared to that of Sydney, contributing to Melbourne gaining seven ranks in the GSER in 3 years. This is all the more impressive when knowing that LaunchVic's budget was only $10M USD per year. This proven approach of integrating funding and program policies for maximum impact, including considerably broadening the funnel, is what we are succinctly describing below.
With this in mind, we recommend the following:
2 See https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/evaluation-of-venture-capital-schemes
Startup Genome | San Francisco • Berlin • London • Delhi • Tokyo • Abu Dhabi • Bangalore • São Paulo
p. 45
Powered by FlippingBook