Appendix A: Methodological Justification for Unified Capital Strategy Outcomes This appendix provides the empirical and methodological basis for extrapolating British Columbia’s innovation tax credit results to a proposed national framework. It draws on peer- reviewed research, international precedents, and updated economic conditions to justify the assumptions behind the projected fiscal and economic impacts within this report.
1. Extrapolation of British Columbia’s Results to a National Framework
The extrapolation of British Columbia’s 3:1 tax revenue-to-credit ratio to a national framework draws directly from third-party analysis of the province’s Venture Capital Program between 2001 and 2008 (Hellmann & Schure, 2010). During this period, companies participating in the program: Generated C$1.98 in provincial taxes and C$2.92 in combined federal and provincial taxes for every C$1 of tax credit issued Leveraged C$256 million in tax credits into more than C$2.3 billion in equity investment In Greater Vancouver—the province’s most active region for capital deployment—supported firms averaged 14.6 full-time employees, added 3.06 new jobs annually, and created 2.14 jobs for every C$10,000 in tax credits. These results demonstrate the fiscal and economic potential of targeted investment incentives. However, job creation was concentrated in urban centres, underscoring the need for nationally coordinated capital deployment mechanisms—such as those envisioned under the proposed Entrepreneurial Capital Catalyst Initiative (ECCI)—to ensure more equitable access to growth capital across regions. Importantly, Canada’s innovation ecosystem is significantly more advanced today than it was in 2001–2008. With stronger capital infrastructure, better-informed investors, and more sophisticated program delivery, the job creation benefits of a national strategy are likely to exceed historical benchmarks.
Structural Advancements in Canada’s Innovation Economy:
Systemic improvements in policy coordination, capital recycling, and market maturity justify conservative scaling of BC’s results.
These shifts provide a robust foundation for estimating proportional national outcomes, while applying conservative assumptions for risk, geography, and sectoral variance.
48
Powered by FlippingBook